↓ Skip to main content

A modified Delphi study of screening for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A modified Delphi study of screening for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rochelle E Watkins, Elizabeth J Elliott, Jane Halliday, Colleen M O’Leary, Heather D’Antoine, Elizabeth Russell, Lorian Hayes, Elizabeth Peadon, Amanda Wilkins, Heather M Jones, Anne McKenzie, Sue Miers, Lucinda Burns, Raewyn C Mutch, Janet M Payne, James P Fitzpatrick, Maureen Carter, Jane Latimer, Carol Bower

Abstract

There is little reliable information on the prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) in Australia and no coordinated national approach to facilitate case detection. The aim of this study was to identify health professionals' perceptions about screening for FASD in Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 32%
Psychology 9 12%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,424,842
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,971
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,764
of 286,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#27
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.