You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for development of the guideline for reporting evidence based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET) statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna C Phillips, Lucy K Lewis, Maureen P McEvoy, James Galipeau, Paul Glasziou, Marilyn Hammick, David Moher, Julie K Tilson, Marie T Williams |
| Abstract |
There are an increasing number of studies reporting the efficacy of educational strategies to facilitate the development of knowledge and skills underpinning evidence based practice (EBP). To date there is no standardised guideline for describing the teaching, evaluation, context or content of EBP educational strategies. The heterogeneity in the reporting of EBP educational interventions makes comparisons between studies difficult. The aim of this program of research is to develop the Guideline for Reporting EBP Educational interventions and Teaching (GREET) statement and an accompanying explanation and elaboration (E&E) paper. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 13% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 32% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2013.
All research outputs
#5,293,499
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#953
of 3,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,257
of 293,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.