↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal strain from velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a validation study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longitudinal strain from velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a validation study
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Einar Heiberg, Ulrika Pahlm-Webb, Shruti Agarwal, Erik Bergvall, Helen Fransson, Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg, Marcus Carlsson, Håkan Arheden

Abstract

Regional myocardial function is typically evaluated by visual assessment by experienced users, or by methods requiring substantial post processing time. Visual assessment is subjective and not quantitative. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and validate a simple method to derive quantitative measures of regional wall function from velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and provide associated normal values for longitudinal strain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 63%
Psychology 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2013.
All research outputs
#3,438,497
of 12,142,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#390
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,914
of 291,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,142,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.