You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Longitudinal strain from velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a validation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Einar Heiberg, Ulrika Pahlm-Webb, Shruti Agarwal, Erik Bergvall, Helen Fransson, Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg, Marcus Carlsson, Håkan Arheden |
| Abstract |
Regional myocardial function is typically evaluated by visual assessment by experienced users, or by methods requiring substantial post processing time. Visual assessment is subjective and not quantitative. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and validate a simple method to derive quantitative measures of regional wall function from velocity encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and provide associated normal values for longitudinal strain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,621,228
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#705
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,983
of 290,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.