↓ Skip to main content

A colorectal cancer genome-wide association study in a Spanish cohort identifies two variants associated with colorectal cancer risk at 1p33 and 8p12

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A colorectal cancer genome-wide association study in a Spanish cohort identifies two variants associated with colorectal cancer risk at 1p33 and 8p12
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ceres Fernandez-Rozadilla, Jean-Baptiste Cazier, Ian P Tomlinson, Luis G Carvajal-Carmona, Claire Palles, María J Lamas, Montserrat Baiget, Luis A López-Fernández, Alejandro Brea-Fernández, Anna Abulí, Luis Bujanda, Juan Clofent, Dolors Gonzalez, Rosa Xicola, Montserrat Andreu, Xavier Bessa, Rodrigo Jover, Xavier Llor, The EPICOLON Consortium, Víctor Moreno, Antoni Castells, Ángel Carracedo, Sergi Castellvi-Bel, Clara Ruiz-Ponte

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a disease of complex aetiology, with much of the expected inherited risk being due to several common low risk variants. Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have identified 20 CRC risk variants. Nevertheless, these have only been able to explain part of the missing heritability. Moreover, these signals have only been inspected in populations of Northern European origin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Uruguay 1 2%
Unknown 52 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,742,867
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,111
of 10,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,084
of 281,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#217
of 370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.