You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-021-05939-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiabin Jin, Yusheng Shi, Mengmin Chen, Jianfeng Qian, Kai Qin, Zhen Wang, Wei Chen, Weiwei Jin, Fengchun Lu, Zheyong Li, Zehua Wu, Li Jian, Bing Han, Xiao Liang, Chuandong Sun, Zheng Wu, Yiping Mou, Xiaoyu Yin, Heguang Huang, Hao Chen, Georgios Gemenetzis, Xiaxing Deng, Chenghong Peng, Baiyong Shen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#14,792,181
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,809
of 5,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,011
of 497,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#115
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.