↓ Skip to main content

Identification and characterisation of vaginal lactobacilli from South African women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and characterisation of vaginal lactobacilli from South African women
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonal Pendharkar, Tebogo Magopane, Per-Göran Larsson, Guy de Bruyn, Glenda E Gray, Lennart Hammarström, Harold Marcotte

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV), which is highly prevalent in the African population, is one of the most common vaginal syndromes affecting women in their reproductive age placing them at increased risk for sexually transmitted diseases including infection by human immunodeficiency virus-1. The vaginal microbiota of a healthy woman is often dominated by the species belonging to the genus Lactobacillus namely L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii and L. iners, which have been extensively studied in European populations, albeit less so in South African women. In this study, we have therefore identified the vaginal Lactobacillus species in a group of 40 African women from Soweto, a township on the outskirts of Johannesburg, South Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 24 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,434
of 8,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,993
of 292,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#36
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.