You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Where on earth to publish? A sample survey comparing traditional and open access publishing in the oncological field
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-9966-32-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabetta Poltronieri, Elena Bravo, Tiziana Camerini, Maurizio Ferri, Roberto Rizzo, Renata Solimini, Gaetana Cognetti |
| Abstract |
The paper intends to help scientific authors to make the best choice of journals in which to publish, by describing and comparing journal features in the area of oncology. For this purpose, the authors identified impact factor (IF) ranking, cost options and copyright conditions offered to authors wishing to publish in full open access (OA), subscription-based or hybrid journals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 29% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,495,301
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#370
of 2,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,508
of 286,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.