You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Paradoxical sex-specific patterns of autoantibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-021-03184-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yunxian Liu, Joseph E. Ebinger, Rowann Mostafa, Petra Budde, Jana Gajewski, Brian Walker, Sandy Joung, Min Wu, Manuel Bräutigam, Franziska Hesping, Elena Rupieper, Ann-Sophie Schubert, Hans-Dieter Zucht, Jonathan Braun, Gil Y. Melmed, Kimia Sobhani, Moshe Arditi, Jennifer E. Van Eyk, Susan Cheng, Justyna Fert-Bober |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,703 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 259 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 78 | 5% |
| Canada | 54 | 3% |
| Germany | 44 | 3% |
| Australia | 36 | 2% |
| Spain | 22 | 1% |
| France | 21 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 21 | 1% |
| Japan | 21 | 1% |
| Other | 155 | 9% |
| Unknown | 992 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1483 | 87% |
| Scientists | 104 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 86 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 28 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1740. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,758
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2
of 4,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266
of 514,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.