↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Transcriptome and de novo analysis of Rosa xanthina f. spontanea in response to cold stress

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Transcriptome and de novo analysis of Rosa xanthina f. spontanea in response to cold stress
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12870-021-03338-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Defeng Zhuang, Ce Ma, Li Xue, Zhen Li, Cheng Wang, Jiajun Lei, Xingfu Yuan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#15,321,665
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,483
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,685
of 497,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#25
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.