↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the effect of a proposed logistics fee cap on pharmaceuticals in South Africa - a pre and post analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the effect of a proposed logistics fee cap on pharmaceuticals in South Africa - a pre and post analysis
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-1184-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Varsha Bangalee, Fatima Suleman

Abstract

South Africa has proposed the implementation of a maximum logistics fee paid by pharmaceutical manufacturers to wholesalers and distributors. However very little knowledge exists of the effects, unintended or otherwise, of the implementation of these proposed regulations, which are required to guide further policy development and implementation. The objectives of this study was to therefore evaluate the effects of the proposed logistics fee cap on different pharmaceuticals and different dosage forms, as well as to observe the logistics fee contribution to the Single Exit Price. Private sector medicine prices were sourced from the South African Medicine Price Registry as at 20 December 2013. For each medicine the maximum logistics fee was calculated based on the 2012 proposed government guidelines. The logistics fee as a percentage of the final Single Exit Price was calculated, as part of the analysis of results. Out of the 47 medicines in the overall sample from the current study, only 16 medicines showed a decrease in the Single Exit Price with the application of the maximum logistics fee cap. This study reveals the need for greater transparency of the mark ups along the distribution chain as well as further research with regards to the costing of logistics fees of similar pharmaceuticals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 10%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,620,956
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,800
of 7,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,953
of 389,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#38
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.