You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing reproducibility of inherited variants detected with short-read whole genome sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-021-02569-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bohu Pan, Luyao Ren, Vitor Onuchic, Meijian Guan, Rebecca Kusko, Steve Bruinsma, Len Trigg, Andreas Scherer, Baitang Ning, Chaoyang Zhang, Christine Glidewell-Kenney, Chunlin Xiao, Eric Donaldson, Fritz J. Sedlazeck, Gary Schroth, Gokhan Yavas, Haiying Grunenwald, Haodong Chen, Heather Meinholz, Joe Meehan, Jing Wang, Jingcheng Yang, Jonathan Foox, Jun Shang, Kelci Miclaus, Lianhua Dong, Leming Shi, Marghoob Mohiyuddin, Mehdi Pirooznia, Ping Gong, Rooz Golshani, Russ Wolfinger, Samir Lababidi, Sayed Mohammad Ebrahim Sahraeian, Steve Sherry, Tao Han, Tao Chen, Tieliu Shi, Wanwan Hou, Weigong Ge, Wen Zou, Wenjing Guo, Wenjun Bao, Wenzhong Xiao, Xiaohui Fan, Yoichi Gondo, Ying Yu, Yongmei Zhao, Zhenqiang Su, Zhichao Liu, Weida Tong, Wenming Xiao, Justin M. Zook, Yuanting Zheng, Huixiao Hong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 32% |
| Pakistan | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 29 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 27 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,231,016
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#918
of 4,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,212
of 518,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#34
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.