↓ Skip to main content

Patient involvement in patient safety: Protocol for developing an intervention using patient reports of organisational safety and patient incident reporting

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient involvement in patient safety: Protocol for developing an intervention using patient reports of organisational safety and patient incident reporting
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane K Ward, Rosemary RC McEachan, Rebecca Lawton, Gerry Armitage, Ian Watt, John Wright

Abstract

Patients have the potential to provide a rich source of information on both organisational aspects of safety and patient safety incidents. This project aims to develop two patient safety interventions to promote organisational learning about safety - a patient measure of organisational safety (PMOS), and a patient incident reporting tool (PIRT) - to help the NHS prevent patient safety incidents by learning more about when and why they occur.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 170 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 44 25%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 7%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 27 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,762,499
of 14,574,989 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,334
of 5,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,423
of 244,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,574,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them