↓ Skip to main content

Reserve and Reserve-building activities research: key challenges and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reserve and Reserve-building activities research: key challenges and future directions
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12868-016-0297-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn E. Schwartz, Bruce D. Rapkin, Brian C. Healy

Abstract

The concept of Cognitive Reserve has great appeal and has led to an interesting and important body of research. We believe, however, that it is unnecessarily limited by 'habits' of measurement, nomenclature, and intra-disciplinary thinking. A broader, more comprehensive way of conceptualizing Reserve is proposed that invokes a broader measurement approach, nomenclature that uses specific terms embedded in a theoretical model, and crosses disciplines. Building on this comprehensive conceptualization, we will discuss fruitful directions for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 25%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,999,401
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#177
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,038
of 321,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.