You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development, implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based paediatric early warning system improvement programme: the PUMA mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-021-07314-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davina Allen, Amy Lloyd, Dawn Edwards, Kerenza Hood, Chao Huang, Jacqueline Hughes, Nina Jacob, David Lacy, Yvonne Moriarty, Alison Oliver, Jennifer Preston, Gerri Sefton, Ian Sinha, Richard Skone, Heather Strange, Khadijeh Taiyari, Emma Thomas-Jones, Rob Trubey, Lyvonne Tume, Colin Powell, Damian Roland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 36% |
| Australia | 6 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 48% |
| Scientists | 15 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,069,566
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#275
of 8,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,539
of 515,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#4
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.