↓ Skip to main content

Design and methods for evaluating an early childhood obesity prevention program in the childcare center setting

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design and methods for evaluating an early childhood obesity prevention program in the childcare center setting
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-78
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruby Natale, Stephanie Hapeman Scott, Sarah E Messiah, Maria Mesa Schrack, Susan B Uhlhorn, Alan Delamater

Abstract

Many unhealthy dietary and physical activity habits that foster the development of obesity are established by the age of five. Presently, approximately 70 percent of children in the United States are currently enrolled in early childcare facilities, making this an ideal setting to implement and evaluate childhood obesity prevention efforts. We describe here the methods for conducting an obesity prevention randomized trial in the child care setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 384 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 18%
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Researcher 50 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 91 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 20%
Social Sciences 58 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 12%
Psychology 26 7%
Sports and Recreations 26 7%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 103 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2015.
All research outputs
#3,216,367
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,656
of 14,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,273
of 282,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#57
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.