You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence-based cardiovascular magnetic resonance cost-effectiveness calculator for the detection of significant coronary artery disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00833-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ankur Pandya, Yuan-Jui Yu, Yin Ge, Eike Nagel, Raymond Y. Kwong, Rafidah Abu Bakar, John D. Grizzard, Alexander E. Merkler, Ntobeko Ntusi, Steffen E. Petersen, Nina Rashedi, Juerg Schwitter, Joseph B. Selvanayagam, James A. White, James Carr, Subha V. Raman, Orlando P. Simonetti, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Lilia M. Sierra-Galan, Victor A. Ferrari, Mona Bhatia, Sebastian Kelle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,918,206
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#316
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,822
of 518,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.