You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Impact of achondroplasia on Latin American patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2022
Virginia Fano, Chong A. Kim, Pablo Rosselli, Regina El Dib, Renée Shediac, Tatiana Magalhães, Debora Mesojedovas, Juan Llerena
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||3||14%|
|Student > Master||3||14%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||7||32%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,040,389 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
of 2,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 506,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,040,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.