You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Time series analysis of fine particulate matter and asthma reliever dispensations in populations affected by forest fires
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-069x-12-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine T Elliott, Sarah B Henderson, Victoria Wan |
| Abstract |
Several studies have evaluated the association between forest fire smoke and acute exacerbations of respiratory diseases, but few have examined effects on pharmaceutical dispensations. We examine the associations between daily fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and pharmaceutical dispensations for salbutamol in forest fire-affected and non-fire-affected populations in British Columbia (BC), Canada. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Mongolia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 20% |
| Researcher | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 39 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,186,731
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#258
of 1,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,058
of 287,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.