You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relation of corona-specific health literacy to use of and trust in information sources during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-12271-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saskia Maria De Gani, Fabian Marc Pascal Berger, Elena Guggiari, Rebecca Jaks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 67% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Librarian | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,832,127
of 25,386,440 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,293
of 17,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,900
of 518,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#152
of 392 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 392 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.