You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perceptions of environmental change and use of traditional knowledge to plan riparian forest restoration with relocated communities in Alcântara, Eastern Amazon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-10-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle Celentano, Guillaume Xavier Rousseau, Vera Lex Engel, Cristiane Lima Façanha, Elivaldo Moreira de Oliveira, Emanoel Gomes de Moura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 57 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,471,305
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#613
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,419
of 307,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.