The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ventricular flow analysis and its association with exertional capacity in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00832-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaodan Zhao, Liwei Hu, Shuang Leng, Ru-San Tan, Ping Chai, Jennifer Ann Bryant, Lynette L. S. Teo, Marielle V. Fortier, Tee Joo Yeo, Rong Zhen Ouyang, John C. Allen, Marina Hughes, Pankaj Garg, Shuo Zhang, Rob J. van der Geest, James W. Yip, Teng Hong Tan, Ju Le Tan, Yumin Zhong, Liang Zhong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 9% |
Djibouti | 1 | 9% |
Singapore | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Librarian | 2 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 24% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 45% |
Engineering | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,757,722
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#465
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,142
of 529,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.