You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Design and methods for a quasi-experimental pilot study to evaluate the impact of dual active ingredient insecticide-treated nets on malaria burden in five regions in sub-Saharan Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-021-04026-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adama Gansané, Baltazar Candrinho, Aimable Mbituyumuremyi, Perpetua Uhomoibhi, Sagnon NFalé, Audu Bala Mohammed, Wamdaogo Moussa Guelbeogo, Antoine Sanou, David Kangoye, Siaka Debe, Moubassira Kagone, Emmanuel Hakizimana, Aline Uwimana, Albert Tuyishime, Chantal M. Ingabire, Joseph H. Singirankabo, Hannah Koenker, Dulcisaria Marrenjo, Ana Paula Abilio, Crizologo Salvador, Binete Savaio, Okefu Oyale Okoko, Ibrahim Maikore, Emmanuel Obi, Samson Taiwo Awolola, Adedapo Adeogun, Dele Babarinde, Onoja Ali, Federica Guglielmo, Joshua Yukich, Sara Scates, Ellie Sherrard-Smith, Thomas Churcher, Christen Fornadel, Jenny Shannon, Nami Kawakyu, Emily Beylerian, Peder Digre, Kenzie Tynuv, Christelle Gogue, Julia Mwesigwa, Joseph Wagman, Monsuru Adeleke, Ande Taiwo Adeolu, Molly Robertson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | 1 | 10% |
| Uganda | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 36 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,608,536
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,196
of 5,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,740
of 502,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#18
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.