↓ Skip to main content

Different modulation effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on the functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray in patients with migraine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different modulation effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on the functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray in patients with migraine
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12967-021-03024-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Cao, Yue Zhang, Hui Li, Zhaoxian Yan, Xian Liu, Xiaoyan Hou, Weicui Chen, Sierra Hodges, Jian Kong, Bo Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 21 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 21 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#15,609,465
of 23,208,901 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,287
of 4,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,020
of 431,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#44
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,208,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.