You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
3D hanging spheroid plate for high-throughput CAR T cell cytotoxicity assay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-01213-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhenzhong Chen, Seokgyu Han, Arleen Sanny, Dorothy Leung-Kwan Chan, Danny van Noort, Wanyoung Lim, Andy Hee-Meng Tan, Sungsu Park |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,032,354
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#364
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,484
of 510,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#18
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.