↓ Skip to main content

Responsiveness of a modified version of the postural assessment scale for stroke patients and longitudinal change in postural control after stroke - Postural Stroke Study in Gothenburg (POSTGOT) -

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Responsiveness of a modified version of the postural assessment scale for stroke patients and longitudinal change in postural control after stroke - Postural Stroke Study in Gothenburg (POSTGOT) -
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-10-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carina U Persson, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Anna Danielsson, Anna Grimby-Ekman, Per-Olof Hansson

Abstract

Responsiveness data certify that a change in a measurement output represents a real change, not a measurement error or biological variability. The objective was to evaluate the responsiveness of the modified version of the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (SwePASS) in patients with a first event of stroke. An additional aim was to estimate the change in postural control during the first 12 months after stroke onset.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,044
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,645
of 290,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.