↓ Skip to main content

Effects of creep feeding and supplemental glutamine or glutamine plus glutamate (Aminogut) on pre- and post-weaning growth performance and intestinal health of piglets

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of creep feeding and supplemental glutamine or glutamine plus glutamate (Aminogut) on pre- and post-weaning growth performance and intestinal health of piglets
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2049-1891-4-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael A Cabrera, James L Usry, Consuelo Arrellano, Eduardo T Nogueira, Marianne Kutschenko, Adam J Moeser, Jack Odle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 48%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#873
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,895
of 209,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.