You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vivo imaging of the tonoplast intrinsic protein family in Arabidopsis roots
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2229-9-133 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefano Gattolin, Mathias Sorieul, Paul R Hunter, Roman H Khonsari, Lorenzo Frigerio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 30% |
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 73% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2009.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#645
of 3,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,166
of 167,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.