You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral care for intensive care unit patients without mechanical ventilation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01878-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoxia Tang, Yunxia Shen, Xuejiao Pan, Jianglong Liao, Yanfei Xu, Wen Luo, Xiaolin Zhang, Chun’e Li, Qing Wan, Xin Cai, Xiaomei Zhang, Tao Wang, Guilan Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 29 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 30 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,756,057
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#982
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,744
of 500,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#23
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 500,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.