You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative efficacy of two pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide nets (Olyset Plus and PermaNet 3.0) against pyrethroid resistant malaria vectors: a non-inferiority assessment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04041-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Corine Ngufor, Josias Fagbohoun, Abel Agbevo, Hanafy Ismail, Joseph D. Challenger, Thomas S. Churcher, Mark Rowland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
Austria | 1 | 6% |
Niger | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 21% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Decision Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 22 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,870,048
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#668
of 5,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,462
of 503,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#10
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.