You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective association of the SHARE-operationalized frailty phenotype with adverse health outcomes: evidence from 60+ community-dwelling Europeans living in 11 countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-13-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nejma S Macklai, Jacques Spagnoli, Julien Junod, Brigitte Santos-Eggimann |
| Abstract |
Among the many definitions of frailty, the frailty phenotype defined by Fried et al. is one of few constructs that has been repeatedly validated: first in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) and subsequently in other large cohorts in the North America. In Europe, the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) is a gold mine of individual, economic and health information that can provide insight into better understanding of frailty across diverse population settings. A recent adaptation of the original five CHS-frailty criteria was proposed to make use of SHARE data and measure frailty in the European population. To test the validity of the SHARE operationalized frailty phenotype, this study aims to evaluate its prospective association with adverse health outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 30% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,161,257
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,115
of 3,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,501
of 280,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.