↓ Skip to main content

Surgical treatment and outcome of pulmonary hamartoma: a retrospective study of 20-year experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical treatment and outcome of pulmonary hamartoma: a retrospective study of 20-year experience
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, May 2008
DOI 10.1186/1756-9966-27-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Guo, Yun-Ping Zhao, Yao-Guang Jiang, Ru-Wen Wang, Zheng Ma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#574
of 2,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,983
of 97,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them