↓ Skip to main content

Proteome evaluation of homolog abundance patterns in Arachis hypogaea cv. Tifrunner

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proteome evaluation of homolog abundance patterns in Arachis hypogaea cv. Tifrunner
Published in
Plant Methods, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13007-022-00840-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenquan Duan, Yongli Zhang, Tian Zhang, Mingwei Chen, Hui Song

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#14,355,066
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#717
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,549
of 505,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#27
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.