You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reuse of face masks among adults in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11346-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Yin-king Lee, Issac Chun-wing Chan, Owen Pak-man Wong, Yaki Hoi-ying Ng, Crystal Kit-ying Ng, Max Hin-wa Chan, Joe Ka-chun Ng, Hailey Hei-tung Koo, Suk-ting Lam, Ada Cho-wai Chu, Rachel Yuen-shan Wong, Heidi Po-ying Leung, Angel Lok-ching Pun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,161,227
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,142
of 15,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,932
of 442,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#300
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.