You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building the first step: a review of low-intensity interventions for stepped care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1940-0640-7-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John McKellar, Julia Austin, Rudolf Moos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#374
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,586
of 286,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them