↓ Skip to main content

Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) – Abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART) – Abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1573-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Cornish, R. L. Harries, D. Bosanquet, B. Rees, J. Ansell, N. Frewer, P. K. Dhruva Rao, C. Parry, R. Ellis-Owen, S. M. Phillips, C. Morris, J. Horwood, M. L. Davies, M. M. Davies, R. Hargest, Z. Davies, J. Hilton, D. Harris, A. Ben-Sassi, R. Rajagopal, D. Hanratty, S. Islam, A. Watkins, N. Bashir, S. Jones, I. R. Russell, J. Torkington, on behalf of the HART Trial Management Group

Abstract

Incisional hernias are common complications of midline closure following abdominal surgery and cause significant morbidity, impaired quality of life and increased health care costs. The 'Hughes Repair' combines a standard mass closure with a series of horizontal and two vertical mattress sutures within a single suture. This theoretically distributes the load along the incision length as well as across it. There is evidence to suggest that this technique is as effective as mesh repair for the operative management of incisional hernias; however, no trials have compared the Hughes Repair with standard mass closure for the prevention of incisional hernia formation following a midline incision. This is a 1:1 randomised controlled trial comparing two suture techniques for the closure of the midline abdominal wound following surgery for colorectal cancer. Full ethical approval has been gained (Wales REC 3, MREC 12/WA/0374). Eight hundred patients will be randomised from approximately 20 general surgical units within the United Kingdom. Patients undergoing open or laparoscopic (more than a 5-cm midline incision) surgery for colorectal cancer, elective or emergency, are eligible. Patients under the age of 18 years, those having mesh inserted or undergoing musculofascial flap closure of the perineal defect in abdominoperineal wound closure, and those unable to give informed consent will be excluded. Patients will be randomised intraoperatively to either the Hughes Repair or standard mass closure. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of incisional hernias at 1 year as assessed by standardised clinical examination. The secondary outcomes include quality of life patient-reported outcome measures, cost-utility analysis, incidence of complete abdominal wound dehiscence and C-POSSUM scores. The incidence of incisional hernia at 1 year, assessed by computerised tomography, will form a tertiary outcome. A feasibility phase has been completed. The results of the study will be used to inform current and future practice and potentially reduce the risk of incisional hernia formation following midline incisions. ISRCTN 25616490 . Registered on 1 January 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 42 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 48 41%