You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The prognostic utility of protein C as a biomarker for adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03889-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Catenacci, Fatima Sheikh, Kush Patel, Alison E. Fox-Robichaud |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,471,512
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,157
of 6,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,919
of 506,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.