You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Hepatobiliary disease in XLMTM: a common comorbidity with potential impact on treatment strategies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-02171-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adele D’Amico, Antonella Longo, Fabiana Fattori, Michele Tosi, Luca Bosco, Maria Beatrice Chiarini Testa, Maria Giovanna Paglietti, Claudio Cherchi, Adelina Carlesi, Irene Mizzoni, Enrico Bertini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#18,487,595
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,148
of 2,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359,331
of 498,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#91
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.