You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A prospective observational study with dose volume parameters predicting rectosigmoidoscopic findings and late rectosigmoid bleeding in patients with uterine cervical cancer treated by definitive radiotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiation Oncology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-8-28 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tae Hyun Kim, Joo-Young Kim, Dae Kyung Sohn, Yeon-Joo Kim, Yoon-Seok Lee, Sung Ho Moon, Sang Soo Kim, Dae Yong Kim |
Abstract |
We assessed the value of dose-volumetric parameters predicting rectosigmoid mucosal changes (RMC) and late rectosigmoid complications (LRC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 25% |
Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 35% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,161,257
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#803
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,720
of 282,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.