↓ Skip to main content

Adapting systematic scoping study methods to identify cancer-specific physical activity opportunities in Ontario, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adapting systematic scoping study methods to identify cancer-specific physical activity opportunities in Ontario, Canada
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13643-022-01886-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela J. Fong, Catherine M. Sabiston, Kaitlyn D. Kauffeldt, Jennifer R. Tomasone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 10 77%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,400,204
of 20,886,305 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#451
of 1,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,909
of 362,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,886,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them