You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of nested PCR for the detection of trichomonads in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4118-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chao Lin, Furong Ying, Yanan Lai, Xiaolong Li, Xiangyang Xue, Tieli Zhou, Dongwei Hu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,630
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,176
of 354,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#71
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.