↓ Skip to main content

Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments
Published in
Trials, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13063-021-05965-4
Authors

Caroline Cake, Emma Ogburn, Heather Pinches, Garry Coleman, David Seymour, Fran Woodard, Sinduja Manohar, Marjia Monsur, Martin Landray, Gaynor Dalton, Andrew D. Morris, Patrick F. Chinnery, F. D. Richard Hobbs, Christopher Butler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,679,615
of 21,685,809 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#970
of 5,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,297
of 398,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,685,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them