↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of blood tonic efficacy and chemical constituents of Kadsura interior A.C. Smith and its closely related species

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of blood tonic efficacy and chemical constituents of Kadsura interior A.C. Smith and its closely related species
Published in
Chinese Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13020-021-00544-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Xu, Jiushi Liu, Bin Li, Xueping Wei, Yaodong Qi, Bengang Zhang, Haitao Liu, Peigen Xiao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#320
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,951
of 515,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.