↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of blood tonic efficacy and chemical constituents of Kadsura interior A.C. Smith and its closely related species

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of blood tonic efficacy and chemical constituents of Kadsura interior A.C. Smith and its closely related species
Published in
Chinese Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13020-021-00544-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Xu, Jiushi Liu, Bin Li, Xueping Wei, Yaodong Qi, Bengang Zhang, Haitao Liu, Peigen Xiao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#15,448,169
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#275
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,651
of 499,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.