You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Standardization of evaluation method and prognostic significance of histological response to preoperative chemotherapy in high-grade non-round cell soft tissue sarcomas
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-022-09195-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yoshinao Oda, Kazuhiro Tanaka, Takanori Hirose, Tadashi Hasegawa, Nobuyuki Hiruta, Masanori Hisaoka, Masato Yoshimoto, Hiroshi Otsuka, Hirofumi Bekki, Takeaki Ishii, Makoto Endo, Toshiyuki Kunisada, Toru Hiruma, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya, Hirohisa Katagiri, Yoshihiro Matsumoto, Akira Kawai, Robert Nakayama, Hiroyuki Kawashima, Satoshi Takenaka, Makoto Emori, Munenori Watanuki, Yukihiro Yoshida, Takeshi Okamoto, Junki Mizusawa, Haruhiko Fukuda, Toshifumi Ozaki, Yukihide Iwamoto, Takayuki Nojima |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 50% |
Linguistics | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#16,175,960
of 23,861,036 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,284
of 8,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,283
of 503,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#90
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,861,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,567 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.