You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The lung cancer exercise training study: a randomized trial of aerobic training, resistance training, or both in postsurgical lung cancer patients: rationale and design
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, April 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-155 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lee W Jones, Neil D Eves, William E Kraus, Anil Potti, Jeffrey Crawford, James A Blumenthal, Bercedis L Peterson, Pamela S Douglas |
Abstract |
The Lung Cancer Exercise Training Study (LUNGEVITY) is a randomized trial to investigate the efficacy of different types of exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak), patient-reported outcomes, and the organ components that govern VO2peak in post-operative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Chile | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 318 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 69 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 51 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 7% |
Researcher | 23 | 7% |
Other | 51 | 16% |
Unknown | 75 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 25% |
Sports and Recreations | 53 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 13% |
Psychology | 23 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
Other | 30 | 9% |
Unknown | 89 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,117,240
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#363
of 8,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,807
of 94,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#6
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.