↓ Skip to main content

The WSES/SICG/ACOI/SICUT/AcEMC/SIFIPAC guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute left colonic diverticulitis in the elderly

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The WSES/SICG/ACOI/SICUT/AcEMC/SIFIPAC guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute left colonic diverticulitis in the elderly
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13017-022-00408-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Fugazzola, Marco Ceresoli, Federico Coccolini, Francesco Gabrielli, Alessandro Puzziello, Fabio Monzani, Bruno Amato, Gabriele Sganga, Massimo Sartelli, Francesco Menichetti, Gabriele Adolfo Puglisi, Dario Tartaglia, Paolo Carcoforo, Nicola Avenia, Yoram Kluger, Ciro Paolillo, Mauro Zago, Ari Leppäniemi, Matteo Tomasoni, Lorenzo Cobianchi, Francesca Dal Mas, Mario Improta, Ernest E. Moore, Andrew B. Peitzman, Michael Sugrue, Vanni Agnoletti, Gustavo P. Fraga, Dieter G. Weber, Dimitrios Damaskos, Fikri M. Abu-Zidan, Imtiaz Wani, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Manos Pikoulis, Nikolaos Pararas, Edward Tan, Richard Ten Broek, Ronald V. Maier, R. Justin Davies, Jeffry Kashuk, Vishal G. Shelat, Alain Chicom Mefire, Goran Augustin, Stefano Magnone, Elia Poiasina, Belinda De Simone, Massimo Chiarugi, Walt Biffl, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 35 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 38 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,770,105
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#59
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,261
of 520,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.