Title |
Toxin-neutralizing antibodies protect against Clostridium perfringens-induced necrosis in an intestinal loop model for bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12917-016-0730-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evy Goossens, Stefanie Verherstraeten, Bonnie R. Valgaeren, Bart Pardon, Leen Timbermont, Stijn Schauvliege, Diego Rodrigo-Mocholí, Freddy Haesebrouck, Richard Ducatelle, Piet R. Deprez, Filip Van Immerseel |
Abstract |
Bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis is caused by Clostridium perfringens type A. Due to the rapid progress and fatal outcome of the disease, vaccination would be of high value. In this study, C. perfringens toxins, either as native toxins or after formaldehyde inactivation, were evaluated as possible vaccine antigens. We determined whether antisera raised in calves against these toxins were able to protect against C. perfringens challenge in an intestinal loop model for bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis. Alpha toxin and perfringolysin O were identified as the most immunogenic proteins in the vaccine preparations. All vaccines evoked a high antibody response against the causative toxins, alpha toxin and perfringolysin O, as detected by ELISA. All antibodies were able to inhibit the activity of alpha toxin and perfringolysin O in vitro. However, the antibodies raised against the native toxins were more inhibitory to the C. perfringens-induced cytotoxicity (as tested on bovine endothelial cells) and only these antibodies protected against C. perfringens challenge in the intestinal loop model. Although immunization of calves with both native and formaldehyde inactivated toxins resulted in high antibody titers against alpha toxin and perfringolysin O, only antibodies raised against native toxins protect against C. perfringens challenge in an intestinal loop model for bovine necrohemorrhagic enteritis. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 32% |