↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Sparks, Arisa Harada, Ruchir Chavada, Christopher Trethewy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Unspecified 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,958,424
of 21,814,108 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#541
of 7,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,465
of 403,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,814,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them