You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extraction of total nucleic acids from bacterial isolates using the bioMérieux NucliSENS easyMAG total nucleic acid extractor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12941-016-0168-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor A. Powell, Joel E. Mortensen |
| Abstract |
The BioMerieux NucliSENS easyMAG total nucleic acid extractor was evaluated for use on bacterial isolates in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Forty eight isolates were extracted, yielding quantifiable amounts of DNA for all isolates. The easyMAG is appropriate for DNA extraction from bacterial isolates and will be incorporated in the clinical laboratory. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#352
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,330
of 328,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.