↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between physical activity, physical fitness and overweight in adolescents: a systematic review of studies published in or after 2000

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relationship between physical activity, physical fitness and overweight in adolescents: a systematic review of studies published in or after 2000
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette Rauner, Filip Mess, Alexander Woll

Abstract

Not only in adults but also in children and adolescents, obesity increases the risk for several health disorders. In turn, many factors including genetic variations and environmental influences (e.g. physical activity) increase the risk of obesity. For instance, 25 to 40 percent of people inherit a predisposition for a high body mass index (BMI). The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize current cross-sectional and longitudinal studies on physical activity, fitness and overweight in adolescents and to identify mediator and moderator effects by evaluating the interaction between these three parameters.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 408 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 22%
Student > Bachelor 68 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 8%
Lecturer 28 7%
Other 95 22%
Unknown 67 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 99 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 92 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 9%
Social Sciences 26 6%
Psychology 20 5%
Other 55 13%
Unknown 93 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2013.
All research outputs
#503,692
of 4,507,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#99
of 778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,702
of 285,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 778 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.