You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgery of highly eloquent gliomas primarily assessed as non-resectable: risks and benefits in a cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-13-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandro M Krieg, Lea Schnurbus, Ehab Shiban, Doris Droese, Thomas Obermueller, Niels Buchmann, Jens Gempt, Bernhard Meyer, Florian Ringel |
| Abstract |
Today, the treatment of choice for high- and low-grade gliomas requires primarily surgical resection to achieve the best survival and quality of life. Nevertheless, many gliomas within highly eloquent cortical regions, e.g., insula, rolandic, and left perisylvian cortex, still do not undergo surgery because of the impending risk of surgery-related deficits at some centers. However, pre and intraoperative brain mapping, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM), and awake surgery increase safety, which allows resection of most of these tumors with a considerably low rate of postoperatively new deficits. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2013.
All research outputs
#18,327,422
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,414
of 8,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,309
of 282,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#76
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.